Orthogonal vs Smithery: MCP Tooling Comparison
Compare Orthogonal and Smithery side by side. Both are tools in the MCP Tooling category.
Updated March 27, 2026
The short answer
Choose Orthogonal if solves real friction — agents need API access without manual key management.
Choose Smithery if production-ready platform.
Want to compare Orthogonal and Smithery on your own traffic?
Respan lets you trace LLM and agent calls across any model or framework, A/B test prompts on production traffic, and route requests across 250+ models through one gateway. Free tier covers 10K traces per month. Setup in 5 minutes, no credit card.
Quick Comparison
| Category | MCP Tooling | MCP Tooling |
| Pricing | Usage-based | Free |
| Best For | Developers building agents that consume paid APIs | Developers who want to discover, share, and deploy MCP servers |
| Website | orthogonal.com | smithery.ai |
| Key Features |
|
|
| Use Cases |
|
|
Pros & Cons: Orthogonal vs Smithery
- +Solves real friction — agents need API access without manual key management
- +Strong founder backgrounds in payments (Coinbase, Vercel) and API infrastructure (Google)
- +30+ API partners already onboarded showing solid early supply-side traction
- +MCP-native design aligns with the emerging agent protocol standard
- +Pay-per-call model with no commitments is agent-friendly
- −Marketplace cold-start problem needs both API providers and agent developers
- −Commoditizable if major cloud providers build native agent API marketplaces
- −No public revenue or usage metrics disclosed
- −Thin margin business if acting purely as a payment pass-through
- +Production-ready platform
- +Good performance
- +Active development
- +Strong features
- −Enterprise pricing varies
- −Setup complexity
- −Learning curve required
Pricing: Orthogonal vs Smithery
- · No monthly fees
- · No minimums
- · free credits for new signups
- · MCP server access
- · Core features
- · Community support
- · Basic usage
- · Advanced features
- · Priority support
- · Production usage
- · Custom solutions
- · Dedicated support
- · SLA guarantees
When to Choose Orthogonal vs Smithery
- Agent API access
- Automated API procurement
- Agent tool marketplace
- Discovering and deploying MCP servers
- Sharing MCP servers with the community
- Managing multiple MCP server configurations
How to Choose a MCP Tooling Tool
Key criteria to evaluate when comparing MCP Tooling solutions:
About Orthogonal
Orthogonal is an API marketplace and payment layer for AI agents. Part of YC W2026, it was founded by Christian Pickett (ex-Coinbase payments, ex-Vercel billing) and Bera Sogut (ex-Google reCAPTCHA/Maps, ex-Amazon Robotics, 2x ACM ICPC World Finalist). Developers and agents get instant access to hundreds of paid APIs through a single MCP server or SDK, with no key management and pay-as-you-go pricing.
The platform handles rate limits, retries, and dynamic routing automatically. For API providers, listing once makes their service instantly discoverable by every agent on the platform. Compatible with Claude Code, OpenClaw, Codex, Cursor, and any MCP-compatible agent. The initial focus is on search, scraping, datasets, and AI model APIs.
Orthogonal has 30+ named API partners already integrated including ScrapeGraph, People Data Labs, Apollo.io, and Composio. It supports the x402 protocol for machine-to-machine payments. Think Stripe meets an app store for the agentic API economy.
About Smithery
AI platform providing comprehensive solutions for enterprise applications. The platform offers robust features for production AI deployment with focus on scalability, reliability, and developer experience. Suitable for teams building modern AI systems at scale.
What is MCP Tooling?
Tools and servers built around Anthropic's Model Context Protocol (MCP), enabling standardized tool use, context sharing, and agent interoperability.
Browse all MCP Toolingtools →